Benefits of Triangulating Autosomal DNA Shared Segments
- Grouping – Triangulation of segments shared with your Matches will put most of them into Triangulated Groups (TGs). If nothing else, this organizes your list of shared segments.
- Common Ancestor (CA) – all the Matches in a TG will have the same CA*. The shared DNA segment was passed down from the CA to each Match (which is why the segments match!). Each Match pair in a TG will have a Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) between them. Between different Match pairs in a TG there may be different MRCAs – but all the MRCAs descend from the same CA.
- Team synergy – all the Matches in a TG are cousins to each other; and they all have the same goal: determine the CA. They are automatically a research team. Think of the synergy of such a Team, all focused on the same goal. Each sharing their own insights and info. All working together…
- Multiple Common Ancestors – You may have more than one Common Ancestor with a Match (it’s not uncommon with Colonial American or Ashkenazi Jewish or other endogamous populations). TGs let you sort this out. TGs help you determine which one provided the shared segment (and is thus proved by matching DNA.) When several Matches in a TG can agree on the same CA, we have genealogy triangulation. This means several widely separated cousins have the same CA, so it’s highly probable that is the correct one; and all in the TG should also have the same one.
- Multiple Shared Segments – You may have some Matches with multiple shared segments with you. Usually, these shared segments will be from the same CA, but not necessarily. You could be related to a Match different ways, on different segments. Again, the Matches in a TG need to agree upon the correct CA, and in this way you can determine the few Matches that are related differently on multiple shared segments.
- Eliminate false segments – the shared segments that come from a CA are called IBD (Identical By Descent). Not all of the segments identified by a company as a “matching” or “shared” segments are IBD, some are false positive matches. They were made up by the computer algorithm that searches for matching segments; and they typically include pieces from both of your parents which are not from one Ancestor. By forming TGs, there will be a few segments that overlap, but don’t match either of the two TGs for that chromosome area. These are false positives – often called Identical by Chance (IBC) or Identical by State (IBS). So TGs will identify and eliminate these segments – they are not in TGs.
- Form “Pointers” – When a TG includes a known close cousin, the cousin provides a “Pointer”. You and the cousin have an MRCA – grandparents, great grandparents or more distant grandparents. Other Matches in the TG are usually more distant, but the CA for all of you in the TG has to be ancestral to the MRCA that you and your close cousin share. So that MRCA forms a Pointer to where the CA has to be.
- Brick walls – as an example, let’s say you have 3 Matches in a TG: a first cousin, a fourth cousin and a distant Match. You know the MRCA with the first cousin, and quickly extend that back to the MRCA with the fourth cousin. You have a “Pointer”, but you have a Brick Wall beyond that. Working as a Team, your fourth cousin and the distant Match determine an MRCA that is one or two generations beyond (ancestral to) the MRCA you have with your fourth cousin. Very probably this MRCA (previously unknown to you), will be the parent or grandparent of the above MRCA with your fourth cousin – and you have worked through a Brick Wall.
- Adoptee involvement – TGs are mechanically formed. No genealogy required. Adoptees can do this with several advantages. Their TGs validate your TGs (everyone in a TG should share most of the Matches). Their TGs may add additional Matches to the TG. The adoptee can analyze the Trees and genealogy data provided by the other Matches. An adoptee can serve as an arbiter, facilitator, even Team leader of a TG. The adoptee brings diversity and analysis to the TG Team. This is an excellent way for adoptees to “get involved”.
- Mapping – TGs define each person’s chromosome map – their personal jigsaw puzzle. Each TG describes a puzzle piece. Once you’ve formed as many TGs as you can with your Match segments, you have a better picture of your map. With sufficient TGs, they will be heel-and-toe on each chromosome, even if you don’t know which side the TGs are on. Assigning TGs to a maternal or paternal side (a maternal or paternal chromosome) involves genealogy. But once TGs are assigned, they lock in the structure of your chromosome map.
- Expanding TGs – As additional Matches are added to your Match List each week, they can usually be added to the appropriate TG fairly easily. Each new Match-segment will match (or be In Common With) several of the segment in one TG or the other in this chromosome area. If the new segment does not match either TG (usually with a segment size 7-10cM), then segment can be categorized as IBC. Also the TG boundaries will firm up.
- TG names [extra credit] – now that you have TGs you can give each one a unique name – I recommend start with chromosome number, 01-23, add a letter, A-Z, to indicate about where on the chromosome it is; and then letters M and P, to indicate Maternal or Paternal chromosome (or A and B if you don’t know, yet). Examples: 07GM or 18BP. This can be used as a filing system, as each one will tie to a particular ancestral line for you, and all the info you collect from Matches or research will apply to this TG. Experience indicates you’ll have 400 TGs or so.
- Crossover points [advanced topic] – the TGs define the recombination crossover points unique to your chromosomes. Using the recombination knowledge we have (roughly 1 crossover per 100cM in each generation), we can check our chromosome maps against this knowledge. So if we already see 4 alternating large blocks from grandparents on Chromosome 1, with an unknown block in the middle – we can be pretty confident that that block is from the grandparent that leaves us with 4 blocks, rather than now having 6 alternating blocks.
- Phasing not required – No phased data is needed to form Triangulated Groups.
- Phasing equivalent – Phasing is separating the values of 700,000 SNPs a person (usually you) got from each parent. For instance, a person’s maternal phased atDNA would match his/her mother’s DNA 100%. When you form a Triangulated Group on your maternal side, you know that the TG segment has exactly the same string of SNPs as your mother’s DNA would have for the same location. You don’t know the values of those SNPs, but you don’t really need to know. A TG is basically a phased segment.
- Multiple Ethnicities – TGs will often pretty clearly show different ethnic groups. This is particularly true if parents are from very different admixtures (African, Ashkenazi Jewish, Melugeon, Native American, TimBukTu, etc.) We might also expect ancestries from England or Scandanavia to group differently; or ancestries from Germanna, Pennsylvania Dutch, or other enclaves, to group together. Multiple Ethnicities may even aid in assigning TGs to their respective sides.
* “All the Matches in a TG will have the same CA…” Actually some TGs may span large segments (15cM or more). In these cases a close cousin is often involved. These TGs will actually subdivide into smaller TGs, which will have different CAs. Much more on this in later blog posts. In any case, the segments which tightly overlap each other will have a single CA. But be careful with spread out TGs – they may subdivide and have different CAs.
09 Segmentology: Benefits of Triangulation; Jim Bartlett May 2015
Pingback: The Fundamental Building Blocks of Genetic Genealogy | segment-ology
Pingback: “Benin/Togo” also describes DNA from Ghana & Nigeria | Tracing African Roots
Pingback: “Ivory Coast/Ghana” also describes Liberian DNA | Tracing African Roots
What do you mean by a triangulation group? Does this mean that Person A matches Person B, Person A matches Person C and Person B matches Person C all on the same chromosome segment; or do you just mean that Person A matches Person B, Person A matches Person C on the same segment? I am confused since generally you do not know if Person B matches Person C by looking at your chromosome data.
A matches B, B matches C, and C matches A all three shared segments overlap each other by at least 7cM (5cM is still experimental). You can compare your two Matches at 23andMebor GEDmatch. At FTDNA you need to check that one is in the ICW list of the other – this works over 95% of the time, more if you get more FF Matches in the TG.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Does Triangulation Work? | segment-ology
This was the first time I had heard the term “Crossover Points.” I am a little confused with your definition.
You said, “So if we already see 4 alternating large blocks from grandparents on Chromosome 1, with an unknown block in the middle – we can be pretty confident that that block is from the grandparent that leaves us with 4 blocks, rather than now having 6 alternating blocks.”
I don’t understand that sentence. I think it is the numbers (4, 4, 6) that are confusing me – the math and how you came to the conclusion. Can you elaborate?
Elizabeth, I did get a little ahead of myself. A crossover point is where the DNA changes from one grandparent to the other on the chromosome a child got from his/her parent. On any chromosome the DNA starts with one grandparent and changes (crosses over) to the other parent. This may occur several times on a chromosome – flip-flopping from one grandparent to the other, as you go from one end of the chromosome to the other. This point in this post is that this tends to happen only a few times on each chromosome (on average, about every 100cM or about 35 times, plus or minus 10, or so, times over all 44 autosomes). So you are much more likely to have 4 crossovers, than 6. It sometimes helps to sketch a diagram of the chromosome while reading the explanation.
So this is the same concept as Roberta’s “Two sides of the chromosome, No zipper”? Assuming you’ve read that post. Or the term I’ve heard is recombination, too. If it’s the same concept, then I understand. And after I posted this comment, I went two posts ahead and read about crossovers. 🙂
Elizabeth – Yes. Triangulation is a good way to separate the segments between the two chromosomes. All of these posts, and Roberta’s posts, try to paint the same picture of atDNA in everyday language. The goal is understanding how this biology works, so you can use that knowledge with your genealogy.
Jim – Sent from my iPhone – FaceTime!
I liked the first post but this one jumps into triangulation without any introduction or definition of acronyms
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right Bonnie. I had planned to build up a framework, but jumped in too fast. I’m working on an outline to put everything in order. Please stay tuned.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Segmentology.org by Jim Bartlett | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy